Print This Post Print This Post

Michael Allen

Editor of Democracy Digest. To comment, get more information, or send material that may be of interest to other readers, please e-mail: Michael Allen at michaela@ned.org.

3 responses to “Egypt: authoritarian succession poses strategic dilemma”

  1. [...] Democracy Digest, Michael Allen writes about Egypt’s succession crisis and provides a batch of links dealing with the Mubarak [...]

  2. I would like to correct and comment on the excerpt from Khalil Al-Anani’s article in the Daily Star Egypt. The excerpt above states that “Arab states fall into three categories when it comes to international human rights instruments, argues Khalil Al-Anani [...] Countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan, Tunisia and the UAE have refused to ratify international conventions such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.”

    This statement is incorrect. Egypt ratified the ICCPR on 14 January 1982 and has generally ratified every international human rights treaty. It has *not* respected the treaties in practice but *it* is legally obligated to do so, and those of us working to promote human rights in Egypt should be careful to hold the government to its international legal obligations. Incorrectly stating that Egypt refuses to ratify these conventions only makes it easier for the regime to avoid scrutiny of its anti-democratic practices.

    The same is true for Kuwait (which ratified the ICCPR on 21 May 1996), Jordan (28 May 1975), and Tunisia (18 March 1969).

  3. [...] outlines the tension, “The current regime exhibits a growing contradiction: on one hand, it is a “classic example of stable [...]

Leave a Reply